Neil
In today's blockchain world, restaking has become the coordination layer that connects trust, capital, and consensus across different ecosystems. But as protocols and users chase the next high reward, there's an urgent question to ask i.e. what actually sustains value in restaking?
The short answer is network effects.
The long answer? A deeper understanding of how security, incentives, and strategic integration compound over time in ways that outlast short-term rates.
The illusion of reward rate chasing
In the early DeFi days, reward farming was the gateway drug. The reward rate chase became the meta. Projects would spike in TVL overnight, only to drain the moment rates dipped. But if we've learned anything from the collapse of unsustainable farming loops, it's that high rates without alignment are just temporary illusions.
Restaking is no different. Yes, it starts with incentives. But it matures through infrastructure and network design.
Why network effects trump reward rates
Network effects are notoriously hard to build and nearly impossible to catch up with once they set in. In the context of restaking, they manifest in several compounding layers:
Security as shared infrastructure
Think of restaking as a public utility that secures bridges, oracles, rollups, and middleware. When a protocol restakes assets like ETH to secure multiple services, it's not just creating redundant security. It's creating shared security. This is like a central power grid serving multiple cities. The more cities it connects, the more reliable the grid becomes and the harder it is to replicate.
EigenLayer pioneered this concept on Ethereum by allowing ETH stakers to secure additional services. Now protocols like Kelp are building on this foundation with liquid restaking tokens like rsETH. This allows a single restaked asset to secure multiple services across the ecosystem with aligned incentives.
Incentive alignment beats short-term rewards
Restaking thrives not on temporary incentives, but on organic alignment.
When users stake for the sake of reward alone, they leave when the reward disappears. But when they restake to secure ecosystems they use, build on, or govern, it's a different story.
This is why sustainable restaking protocols focus on building real utility rather than just high reward rates. The best protocols create systems where restakers aren't just chasing rates. They're reinforcing a flywheel that rewards actual usage and long-term participation.
Strategic positioning across ecosystems
Restaking allows protocols to position themselves across ecosystems, much like startups picking early app stores in the mobile boom. If Ethereum rollups are today's iOS, other chains might be the Android equivalents. The protocols that restake across these environments aren't choosing sides. They're building highways between them.
Restaking makes your security model composable. A rollup can rely on Ethereum for base settlement and on restaked middleware for faster data availability. This hybrid security is strategic, not just technical.
Network effects compound, rates decay
Here's the key insight: reward rates decay, but networks compound. Each additional protocol integrated into a restaking system increases the utility of every staked token. A middleware secured by 10 restaked assets is more valuable to the next app than one secured by just one. This is composability at the security layer.
It's like adding new tracks to a train network. Every new destination makes the entire system more useful. And the more useful it is, the more users it attracts, the more tokens it secures, and the flywheel spins.
Value accrual isn't just about rewards, it's about role
In traditional markets, value accrues to assets that have roles, not just rewards. U.S. Treasuries, for instance, are valuable not just for rewards, but for their utility as collateral, safety, and settlement.
The same logic is now true in crypto. If a restaking token is used to secure infrastructure, earns protocol fees, governs treasury flows, and enables insurance layers, then staking it isn't just about earning rewards. It's about owning part of the security economy.
That's where long-term value accrual comes from. Not from a temporary 20% reward rate, but from being foundational.
The rise of protocol governors
Restaking will give rise to a new class of stakeholders: protocol governors. These are token holders who not only restake but also participate in governance across multiple ecosystems, middleware, and application layers.
They'll decide which protocols get security guarantees, which integrations go live, and which revenue models are viable. In this world, staking becomes strategy.
And the early adopters who aligned early with the right networks - the ones that compound trust, not just rewards - will be the ones shaping the next era of decentralized infrastructure.
Why Kelp focuses on sustainable restaking
At Kelp, we believe restaking is more than a mechanism. It's a philosophy. A belief that trust can scale if the incentives are right and the community is aligned.
With rsETH, we focus on creating real utility rather than just high reward rates.
So the next time you see a shiny reward rate, ask yourself:
Does this token secure something that matters?
Is this ecosystem growing in use, not just reward?
Will this stake compound trust or just simulate it?
Because in the long run, network effects are the only rate that never decays.
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Always DYOR and understand the risks involved before depositing into any DeFi protocol.
Sign up for more interesting blogs & updates